Source – MLBPA counter MLB’s international draft proposal; The sides are still far away

Sources told ESPN that the Major League Baseball Players Association opposed the MLB’s original proposal for an international draft – which would allocate significantly more money to international players and meet pre-draft requirements, which the association considers discriminatory. ,

Both sides will have to face a July 25 deadline to agree on some international drafts, which the MLB has called for for the better part over the past two decades. In an effort to entice MLBPA, MLB offered to break free from the qualifying offer system – which disrupts the market for a handful of mid- to high-level free agents each off-season – if both sides are ready for the version. Agree with the international draft. If they do not, the status quo remains in the international market and in the qualifying offering system.

The union submitted a written proposal to MLB negotiators on Friday, and according to a source familiar with the situation, the league expressed displeasure at the union’s demands. Both sides are believed to be far apart, sources on both sides said, but it was an important step, even though it was the first time the MLBPA had agreed to draft any format for its international players.

The league’s proposal from March – the 20-round, hard-slot international draft that will begin in 2024, with नंबर 5.51 million No. 1 total selections and a total of $ 181 million guaranteed costs for the top 600 international players – is ongoing. Table this week .. According to sources, the union has argued for a 20-round draft without hard slots, in which at least $ 260 million will be allocated to the top 600 international players. The league proposed a 20,000 limit for non-draft players and the union proposed a 40,000 limit for non-draft players.

Money will be a key sticking point in international draft negotiations, as it was during the most recent 99-day lockdown that almost torpedoed the 2022 season. The league is unwilling to allocate more dollars at this stage and there is also concern that the removal of rigid slots will boost pre-planned deals in the international market as teams could theoretically pay more to players in the next round. With a strategy that can assure and allocate their draft pool to align.

The age of signing both proposals is the same – players must be 17 years old by September 1 of their first year under a contract with a major league team – but the union has decided to postpone the international draft from early 2024. Is requested. Until September 2023.

The union believes that the difference in the potential cost of an international draft compared to the Rule 4 draft, which occurs each summer and includes amateurs from the US, Canada and Puerto Rico, is a pool for all 30 drafts this year. ). It also recognizes that the league’s logistical requirements for draft-eligible international players, particularly regarding drug testing and disclosure of medical information, are more stringent than those in Rule 4 draft, and that some examples must be reasonable.

The union has also proposed ways to allocate more resources to combat corruption, which has long plagued the international market, in part by creating special committees that can gather intelligence. And can offer solutions. Both sides are working on the premise that July 25 is a difficult deadline, but they can negotiate an extension if needed.

In the current qualifying offer system, teams offer the pending free agent a one-year contract for the average salary of MLB’s 125 highest paid players at the start of the free agency. If that player refuses and signs elsewhere, the original team receives a compensatory draft selection from the signing team.

Ten years ago, in an effort to reduce inequality in international spending, the MLB introduced a system that assigns an international bonus pool to each team, which has become stricter under previous collective bargaining agreements. Using those caps, teams were able to estimate how much they would have been paid several years ago, which, according to people familiar with the international market, gave them the ability to scout players at the age of 12 and agree with them. 13 years old.

Players who have originally promised those teams are prohibited from showing them to other clubs until their official signing date. At times, however, teams have threatened to reduce players’ bonuses before officially signing contracts or withdrawing them altogether, according to several industry sources who have spoken out against the issue in recent years. Those who sign up are required to pay a significant portion of their bonus to their coaches – up to 50%, according to people with knowledge of mobility – and are sometimes sent to specific agencies pre-arranged with those coaches. Agreements have been made.

The league’s current draft proposal was first submitted in July 2021, a source said, but it came back in early March and threatened to cancel the contract on the new CBA which eventually appeared to be close. The MLBPA leadership has long sought to abolish the qualifying offer system, but Latin players have insisted on the idea of ​​linking it to the implementation of the international draft. The MLB eventually gave the MLBPA three options: maintaining the status quo, with a qualification-offer system, and not an international draft; Accepting an international draft in exchange for removing the eligibility proposal system; Or it takes more time to think.

The team chose the third option – but now both sides have once again turned their backs on the big issue.

Leave a Comment